aroraborealis: (Default)
aroraborealis ([personal profile] aroraborealis) wrote2005-02-24 04:32 pm

(no subject)

You can't really know someone until __________.

[identity profile] dbang.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
...you've met them.

[identity profile] jacflash.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
You can't really know someone.

[identity profile] hawkegirl.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Eaten with them (at a minimum)

[identity profile] water-childe.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
you've seen how they handle a stressful or unexpected situation.

[identity profile] snowy-owlet.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that answer depends entirely on the person and the relationship in question.

[identity profile] zzbottom.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
you've seen them at their worst.

(Anonymous) 2005-02-24 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Gone on a good long camping trip with them ♥η

[identity profile] mr-privacy.livejournal.com 2005-02-25 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
You've pwned choicepoint, and read all the gossip-mongering, lies, and slander that those bastards position as 'background checking.'


[identity profile] wolfkitn.livejournal.com 2005-02-25 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
assuming it's possible to know someone, the two best chances you have are by:

1) travelling with them, and
2) having sex with them.

you're likely to see them both at their best and their worst if you do those two things, and you will -definitely- know them (imo).

[identity profile] orangelemon.livejournal.com 2005-02-25 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
you read their meme about the ten things they've done that they think you haven't.

[identity profile] trom.livejournal.com 2005-02-25 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
Eaten at what they think is a really good restaurant and a really bad one. And see if you agree or not :)