aroraborealis (
aroraborealis) wrote2009-08-27 10:56 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
word aversion
Do you have any word aversions?
I have one: "pit" (but only when describing holes or hole-like areas (armpit, tree pit, etc, not, say, when describing the stones in fruit).
I have one: "pit" (but only when describing holes or hole-like areas (armpit, tree pit, etc, not, say, when describing the stones in fruit).
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I'm trying to desensitize myself to the first one, because how else do you describe the texture of a good cake in English?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I have trouble answering this question.
I mean, presumably you don't intend to count words that are generally understood to be epithets... I have trouble with "faggot" or "kike", for example, but I assume that doesn't count.
Moving towards the more idiosyncratic... hm. "Putative" always shocks me a little, presumably because of the Spanish.
I'll echo "fart", also.
no subject
no subject
The authors that have taken over a chunk of the role that newspaper columnists have traditionally filled I would refer to as web-columnists and the things they write as web-columns (except where the website has other content, in which case I'd call them editorials).
Personal things like Rosa writes here (and like I write), I'd call online journals, diaries, or perhaps open letters. While the traditional journal doesn't allow comment and other than as letters to the editor, editorials or columns don't offer response space either, improvements in technology allowing comments in near-real-time don't really affect the content much from the original forms.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Right. Back to work.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Mostly because of hearing them get severely overused to the point of losing their meaning.
Most other words that people dislike tend to rank among my favorites. Especially dirty, gross, or overly graphic words. And combinations thereof. Such as "pussypanties."
What? Go ahead, say it out loud. Make sure you purse your lips. It'll totally brighten your day.
Re:
Re:
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
medieval
skeptic (that 'k' is wrong!)
any word with a (pronounced) "gh" like "yoghurt"
*cringe*
It's all about the context
I dislike "irony/ironic" because they get used by people who wouldn't know irony if it bit them on the ass, which it usually does. Schadenfreude, now? That's an awesome word.
Unique is up on my hate list because people seem to have no idea what it means and thus produce phrases like "more unique". Conversely, sui generis is just awesome and is almost never used except it was used last night by an NPR reporter in describing Ted Kennedy and I liked that.
Re: It's all about the context
Re: It's all about the context
Re: It's all about the context
Re: It's all about the context
Re: It's all about the context
Re: It's all about the context
Re: It's all about the context
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
The Straight Dope: When's the best time to see the arora borealis?
Aroraborealis: [this post]
no subject
I still cannot handle anything with the cutesy ending "-poo" (as in Witchiepoo, from H.R. Pufnstuf), because of childhood verbal abuse. :/
And like