gang rape article: bad angle
Mar. 9th, 2011 11:26 am[trigger warning for outrageous rape apologia]
Good morning,
I'm writing with my concerns about your article titled "Vicious Assault Shakes Texas Town". I am deeply upset by the slant this article takes, focusing on the harm done to the town and to the perpetrators (by their own actions) rather than on outrage on behalf of the victim of, as you title it, a vicious assault.
The fact that this article even suggests that this girl could have brought this on herself by her dress and behavior is reprehensible. I know that we haven't reached a time when a woman won't be accused of "asking for it" when she's raped, even though that would be a horrifying suggestion EVEN IF the victim in this case had been a fully-grown woman, but I am disgusted beyond words that this article takes that approach about a girl who's only 11 years old.
Your article has done a great deal to humanize the men who participated in what is a subhuman act, and your position that they were "drawn into" this act does all right-thinking and right-acting people a disservice.
I am accustomed to knowing that there will always be individual people who disappoint me. I am sorry to see how deeply the NYT disappoints me today.
In outrage,
aroraborealis
Good morning,
I'm writing with my concerns about your article titled "Vicious Assault Shakes Texas Town". I am deeply upset by the slant this article takes, focusing on the harm done to the town and to the perpetrators (by their own actions) rather than on outrage on behalf of the victim of, as you title it, a vicious assault.
The fact that this article even suggests that this girl could have brought this on herself by her dress and behavior is reprehensible. I know that we haven't reached a time when a woman won't be accused of "asking for it" when she's raped, even though that would be a horrifying suggestion EVEN IF the victim in this case had been a fully-grown woman, but I am disgusted beyond words that this article takes that approach about a girl who's only 11 years old.
Your article has done a great deal to humanize the men who participated in what is a subhuman act, and your position that they were "drawn into" this act does all right-thinking and right-acting people a disservice.
I am accustomed to knowing that there will always be individual people who disappoint me. I am sorry to see how deeply the NYT disappoints me today.
In outrage,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)